True Hate In The Immigration Bill

The Gang of Eight’s immigration bill, currently under way in Congress, was to feature a biometric-based national ID card, required for any American to work. This proposal would require employers to scan these national ID cards, placing information into a databased owned by the federal government. Without this national ID card, no one would be able to work in the United States.

As Ron Paul points out, this may eventually be required for all Americans to make a purchase. This possibility brings to mind the biblical Book of Revelation, where under the reign of the Antichrist, “no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark” (Rev 13:17 KJV).

The amendment to the bill which contained this proposal failed to pass, but Sen. Marco Rubio intends to fight for the biometric national ID once the bill reaches the floor.

Republicans in Congress, eager to encourage and protect modern “Mexican-American Slavery” for their large corporate donors, always hop aboard these occasional “immigration bills” using marketing slogans like “a path to citizenship” to keep people in slavery a little while longer.

If these RINOs did indeed care about minorities, they would publicly acknowledge our modern “Mexican-American Slavery” and fight it, not promote it.

Republicans are constantly accused of racism and hate, most notably by the Mainstream Media 1.0. “Path to Citizenship” proposals are thus politically healthy. But what does creating a national federal database of all Americans’ fingerprints, DNA, and the like have to do with racism? Even the KKK believes in liberty for white people only, while Washington hates and destroys liberty for all – how “free country” is that?

During Bush II’s post-9/11 laws which decreased freedom in the name of national security, many quoted Ben Franklin’s statement that “those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Since Obama was elected, freedom has been given up in the name of access to health care and fighting bullying and obesity. Likewise, Americans need to stop falling for, or pretending to support, the belief that fighting discrimination is more important than fighting for freedom.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Desensitization And The War On Privacy & Property Rights

The EFF's "Who Has Your Back?" Report

About a week ago, the Electronic Frontier Foundation released "Who Has Your Back?" A traditionally libertarian and anti-regulation civil liberties organization, the EFF is now making ridiculous and ludicrous claims about social networking companies and search engines. Facebook and Google are supposedly fighting for your privacy rights in Congress, Twitter requires a warrant for access to the content you publicly post, and AT&T, who was granted immunity by a bipartisan Congress after the EFF successfully sued them for illegal collusion with the NSA, is now fighting for your privacy as well.

Claims that companies like Facebook and Google, which require you give them your real first and last name and (in certain cases) your phone number, are protecting your privacy, provide a glimpse of a key weapon in the war on privacy and property: desensitization.

We often see fictional “anti-”malware programs and “Nigerian spam” make these same requests of us. Yet legitimate companies are engaging in these same tactics – a different group of unknown people, doing the exact same thing, and “it’s all OK”.

The EFF’s report also commends cloud-based and other remote backup services, an ongoing threat to private property rights being forced upon the public. If a phishing message offered to take care of your banking, will, estate, and other personal data for you, would you fall for it?

Desensitization is a very useful weapon in Washington’s fight against personal and economic freedom. With desensitization, you can make sexual abuse and manufacturing pornography valid airport security procedures. You can make plastic into money. You can make private property the “intellectual property” of someone else. You can support the Second Amendment, but “assault” weapons don’t count.

Through repeated advertising by these privacy-invasive companies, America has become desensitized to loss of privacy rights. Many of these companies, such as Facebook, serve no useful purpose – a phone call, e-mail, or simply waiting until you see the person again can do the exact same thing, and without putting a carbon copy of your life into the hands of unknown people. (It’s true – think about it!) We need to start examining the violations of freedom we have allowed to be acceptable. If we do not, there will be no freedom at all, and there will be no need for a “Who Has Your Back?” report, because no one will care.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

The Most Important Freedom In The Bill Of Rights

Over the past few months, we have had several gun control proposals in Congress, accompanied by the United Nations national/individual disarmament treaty and a media marathon of man-made violence.

Many conservatives and libertarians believe that the 2nd Amendment, the right to keep and bear arms, is the most important Amendment of the Bill of Rights. They point out that the 2nd Amendment is not merely about self-defense or hunting, but as a check on government tyranny, frequently quoting the statements by Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence.

While the 2nd Amendment may function this way, the right to keep and bear arms is not the keystone of the Bill of Rights. This may sound strange, but the keystone of the Bill of Rights is actually part of the 1st Amendment: Freedom of Religion.

Americans stand by the Constitution and the Bill of Rights not because it is the law of the land, but because they believe in freedom. If Americans did not believe in freedom, they would not insist on freedom, and there would be no freedom.

Right now there are two major threats to freedom of religion:

  1. Modern atheism, which uses not only the court system but any means necessary to eliminate public display, discussion, or practice of religion. The ACLU, Freedom From Religion Foundation, and Americans United are the biggest repeat offenders. Removing nativity scenes, attempting to dig up religious gravestones in military cemeteries, banning teaching of Judeo-Christian creation myths, and eliminating even a moment of silence for private prayer in any religion, are notable instances in this group.
  2. Islam, which believes not in freedom, but theocracy. The sinful and unethical behaviors broadcasted from the Left Coast provide credence to their theocratic agenda. As the enabler of sin and unethical behavior, Muslim leaders often teach that freedom must be eliminated from America. Islam has no room for freedom, only the theocratic legal system outlined in the Quran. Unlike the Bible, there is no room for interpretation or apologies for a theocratic past, and also unlike the Bible, their religion is eternally mandated through force. Many people have been killed, many places have been destroyed, and many things have been censored. Islam cannot exist in its entirety under a free society, and Muslim leaders have no desire to tailor it for one.

As we can see, when people do not believe in freedom, they do not work for freedom, and they neither have nor want freedom. The basis for all freedom in the Bill of Rights is Freedom of Religion – the freedom to believe in freedom, and to ensure that freedom remains the law of the land.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 3 Comments

“Un-American Version” of LibertyColumns.com Library: Volume III released

From the post announcing the original version:

 

LibertyColumns.com Library are books containing columns from the blog LibertyColumns.com, with all copyrighted content removed (brief footnotes and occasional bracketed summaries are added when needed). The books are available at the Internet Archive in PDF and other formats, and they are dedicated to the public domain according to the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication.

Volume III contains all columns on LibertyColumns.com written from September 2012 through December 2012. It is the “Doomsday Edition” of LibertyColumns.com Library, as it is published on on December 20, 2012, the day before the end of the Mayan Calendar, concluding with the post Armageddon is Here. The final week of December will begin Volume IV, with December 30th (Sunday) being the week of January 1, 2013 (Tuesday).

 

The “Un-American Version” of LibertyColumns.com Library: Volume III was released on April 16, 2013. From the Preface to the Un-American Version:

 

This edition of LibertyColumns.com Library: Volume III is intended for nations where the “Farewell Speech” of Ron Paul would be copyrighted, either by Ron Paul or the US Federal Government, and could be used to seize this book and prosecute and intimidate lovers of liberty.

Why did I use the term “un-American”? Not as an insult toward people of other nations. This book is “un-American” because life, liberty, property, and the US Constitution itself, is increasingly becoming “un-American”. Politicians of both parties continue to destroy and ignore the US Constitution, while portraying its supporters as violent, crazy, and intolerant.

This book has not been updated for the times – the columns (and footnotes) are presented identically to the original LibertyColumns.com Library: Volume III (2012, September through December). This “Un-American Version” lacks two columns: “Ron Paul’s Farewell Speech” and “Why Libertarianism Fails: Thoughts On Ron Paul’s Farewell Speech”.

 

 

This book is intended only for countries where Ron Paul’s Farewell Speech is copyrighted. Everyone else should use the original version.

 

Download LibertyColumns.com Library: Volume III: 2012, September through December at the Internet Archive (Original Version) (Un-American Version)

 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Are We Dealing With A Greater Evil?

Much has happened since Obama took office. Politicians, Democrat and Republican, have stolen America’s freedoms and compromised its defense. Thieves have stolen our money and sent it to foreign corporations, crooks have destroyed health care to made Americans tax evaders at birth, and a twisted, violent theology has been entering our courts.

Frequently we engage in activism to regain our stolen freedoms, values, prosperity, and integrity, whether it be the Tea Party Movement on the right or the Occupy Wall Street Movement on the left.

Every time, however, an individual from our personal groups are elected, there is a sudden and unexpected change to their values, unanimously supporting destructive policies and lying that they are fighting against them.

But is there more to this story?

Note the following:

  • Planned Parenthood and Obamacare, which slaughters millions in their genocide against the unwanted, continues to receive funding from “pro-life” politicians. Often trade agreements, supported unanimously by both parties, encourage or mandate legalized abortion and penalize nations that stand against it (frequently nations in Latin America). Recall also the 2012 Republican ticket: Mitt Romney is pro-choice, and Paul Ryan refuses to discuss “social issues”.
  • Invasive security procedures at airports border on sexual abuse of children.
  • “End-of-life counseling” encourages the euthanasia of the elderly.
  • Mainstream doctors in a post-Obamacare nation are now discouraging preventative screening for breast and prostate cancer.
  • The American banking system operates in the interest of every country, except America, which they deliberately destroy.
  • Supposed advocates for freedom (liberals, feminists) encourage Islam’s treatment of women as a valid personal choice. Islam’s inhumane and violent laws are being used in court cases against non-Muslims.

As we can see, the elderly, children, the pre-born, Jews, Christians, freedom of religion, and the justice system are the targets of our politicians. Feminists promote violent treatment of women, atheists ensure that no religion is visible in public, liberals support death sentences for people they can’t afford, and Christians are basing their faith on psychology rather than the Bible (or sacred traditions, or other testaments of Christ).

The targets in America seem not to be the enemies of special interests, but the enemies and beliefs of the Judeo-Christian God.

Are we fighting against crooks being paid off by special interests, or are we fighting the actual Devil, a murderer, a liar, the enemy of God, fighting God’s chosen people and their heirs?

This issue is crucial to American politics and society and needs to be examined.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Obama: America’s Abusive Husband & Father

Obama has done some very disturbing things during his Presidency. Often, his “Hope & Change” seems like mental illness to those who believe in freedom and the right to private property and privacy.

Indeed this is true. Obama and his supporters act like an abusive husband/father in a broken home.

The abuser must assert his dominance. Obama accomplishes this by interventionist foreign policies which are anti-freedom, anti-America, and anti-Israel.

The abuser is controlling of his family. He needs to be involved when his wife and children are traveling. This is shown under Obama as nude airport scanners and invasive “searching” of children under the TSA.

The abuser must know who your friends and contacts are, what Web sites you visit, how you spend your money, and he must have the ability to isolate you from the public. We can see this in Obama’s policies regarding the Internet, such as his attempts with SOPA/PIPA and his shutting down of domain names, “cybersecurity”, the Internet Kill Switch, and the Internet sales tax he is likely to sign very shortly.

The abuser exploits poverty to keep the victims in his broken home. Obama had a role in the Copyright Alert System now in force by the major ISPs, in which only those who cannot afford to go to court against the RIAA/MPAA (residential customers) are victims of the various ISP-inflicted “punishments”.

The abuser pays close attention to his family’s behavior. He is always watching you, as Obama is with domestic drones.

The abuser has no sympathy for the weak. Obama’s various guidelines for finding suspicious persons include Constitutionalists who believe in individual rights, as well as environmentalists and animal rights activists, who believe they are standing up for the weak.

The abuser feels no guilt in cheating on his spouse. Obama’s guidelines for suspicious persons include supporters of Judeo-Christian family values, those who oppose abortion, euthanasia, and alternative family structures.

Through violence, the abuser controls how healthy you are, as Obama does with Obamacare.

The abuser earns support from those who encourage the family to stay in the situation, including from other abusers, as well as pro-family people who are unaware of the abuse, such as local pastors. Neocons such as John McCain have consistently supported Obama’s policies, asserting their belief that America is Obama’s battlefield, supporting drones on American soil, and recently promoting an Internet sales tax and biometric identification. The NDAA, supported by Obama and McCain, gives the President complete control over your fate. The abuser asserts this same control over members of his family.

The abuser has his enablers. This includes Obama’s misled voters and the Mainstream Media’s propaganda, as well as the Occupy Wall Street movement, promoting Obama despite fighting his unjust pro-Wall-Street policies. Also included among Obama’s enablers are the “Tea Party” Republicans, such as John Boehner and Paul Ryan. “Occupy Wall Street Republicans” such as Boehner and Ryan refuse to stand up against Obama, enabling Obamacare, deficits, the repealed Bush “tax cuts for the rich”, Obama’s funding of abortion and stem cell research, and all the other anti-Judeo-Christian, anti-America, anti-Constitution, and anti-capitalist policies.

Barack Obama, Old Guard Neocons, and Occupy Wall Street Republicans have been nothing but harmful to the United States. Abuse of Americans and their freedoms are rampant under this administration. We must stop becoming desensitized enablers of Washington’s abuse, or we will continue to have politicians such as Obama and his allies, until the abuse to America ends in death.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Pope, Same Liberal Media

Pope Francis, the first Pope of that royal name, was elected by the cardinals of the Roman Catholic Church on March 13, 2013.

Francis is the first pope of the Americas, a region that nobody believed (but many hoped) a pope would come from.

Like Benedict XVI, however, Francis is faced with a challenge – the liberal media.

Recall that when Pope Benedict XVI was elected, the Mainstream Media 1.0 hated him. He was not only very conservative but very educated, serving an academic position and acting as a ghostwriter for Pope John Paul II during his later years. Benedict XVI was very conservative during his papacy, most notably with his executive order allowing churches to vote to offer the Tridentine Rite (Latin Mass), though he tended to be liberal at times.

The liberal Mainstream Media did everything they could to dig up scandals on Benedict XVI, frequently including a call for him to resign with every article published (as well as consistent attempts to push him into allowing abortion, euthanasia, female priesthood, and gay marriage and adoption).

When Benedict XVI did resign, the Mainstream Media started pulling the same tricks on Francis I. Francis has already stated his opposition to gay families and abortion. Digging up a military scandal, and having Michael Moore release a fake photo of a non-Francis giving Communion to an Argentinian dictator, accompanies pushing the liberal agenda with regard to abortion, gay marriage, female priesthood, etc.

There is no reason for the Mainstream Media to do this. Catholics are not required by their faith to agree with the pope 100% on everything, nor is anyone forced to be Catholic. One can change their religion anytime, or start their own church, as the Society of St. Pius X did in their opposition to Vatican II and the New Mass.

Sometimes the Mainstream Media 1.0 and the liberal agenda it pushes is very obvious. This has consistently been the case with its constant attempt to bully the Catholic Church into approving abortion and other liberal causes. This happened during the reign of Benedict XVI, and will continue to happen under Francis I.

As is our right under a secular democratic republic, we are free to believe what we choose to believe. If you disagree with someone else’s beliefs, feel free to tell them yours, but don’t bully or judge them. Intimidation is never the answer.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment